Essay On Who Is Responsible For Bribe: Giver Or Taker In English Bribery is an accepted but forbidden activity that occurs all around the world. While there are more bribery cases in some countries than others, there are still others. The question of who is more at fault for a bribe—the donor or the taker—has been hotly contested. While there is no definitive answer, in the majority of situations both parties are equally liable because they both stand to gain from the transaction.
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English (100 Words)
One of the most pervasive forms of corruption in our nation is bribery. At some point or another, we have all been guilty of bribing someone. It could be something as simple as paying our sister to keep something from our parents, or it could be something more substantial like paying a traffic police officer to avoid paying a fee for breaking a traffic law.
Bribery is often used to expeditiously complete difficult assignments. On the other side, asking for a bribe is a simple way to make money. Bribe givers and takers engage in this behaviour to further their hidden agendas. But they are unaware of the harm they are doing to society as a whole.
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English (200 Words)
A bribe is typically offered to do a task fast and efficiently. A bribe giver may give money or something else to a bribe taker. Direct cash payments, benefits, discounts, complimentary trips, complimentary meals, funding, sponsorships, high-paying jobs, promotions at work, pay raises, lucrative contracts, commissions, tips, real estate, jewellery, pricey products, stocks, or pretty much anything else can be used as bribes. A person who accepts bribes views it as an opportunity to earn money with little effort. Both bribe givers and recipients profit from the situation.
Bribery has been a common practise for many years. People have struggled with the question of whether the giver or the recipient is to blame for bribery for ages. In the majority of cases, both the bribe giver and taker are accountable for this wrongdoing.
However, on occasion, those in charge deprive innocent people of their fundamental rights. The products and services to which they are legally entitled are demanded from them in exchange for money or other favours by corrupt officials. In these situations, it is obvious that the person who accepted the bribe committed bribery.
However, it can be argued that the entire system is at fault, not just the bribe recipient or giver. More so than the giver or taker of the bribe, the system is to blame for corruption. Each bribery case should be carefully examined, and the guilty party should face harsh punishment.
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English (300 Words)
Bribery is a morally repugnant act. It produces pain for the underprivileged while elevating the rich to positions of power. Bribe givers frequently resort to bribery because they are unable to perform a crucial task without it. On the other side, those who accept bribes take advantage of the circumstance and view it as a simple chance to juggle money.
Takers of Bribes Are Held Liable for Bribery
Typically, those who accept bribes are held accountable for bribery. A person who has chosen to accept bribe for any purpose is in no way to be seen as a victim. The bribe donor may have made a profitable offer to him without his asking for it. However, he is liable for bribery if he accepts it and offers an illegal or even legal service in return.
It would be incorrect to blame simply those who accept bribes for bribery, though. Bribe givers are equally accountable because they complete their job in exchange for the bribe. Coercive bribing is a different situation, though. In these situations, bribe takers are held accountable for bribery and face heavy punishment if a potential bribe giver rejects their advances and files a court complaint.
Giving and receiving bribes is a vicious cycle.
It is frequently asserted that there cannot practically be any bribe takers if there are no bribe givers. Yes, this is accurate. No one will be able to accept a bribe if no one is willing to offer one. On the other hand, it is also true that no one will provide a bribe if no one demands one. Additionally, bribe providing will end automatically if people refuse to accept bribes and cease accepting them altogether. It is hence a vicious loop. It is simple to criticise one party while yet bearing equal responsibility for this continued conduct.
To end the abhorrent cycle of offering and accepting bribes, a stringent legal structure needs to be implemented. People who engage in the practise should face harsh penalties.
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English (400 Words)
A person who offers or offers to give money or other goods to a person in authority in exchange for favours is known as a bribe giver. The task that the bribe donor wants completed is typically unlawful. Or the judicial process might be very drawn out and tiresome, so he proposes a bribe to spare himself the trouble. A person who demands or accepts cash or other valuables in exchange for providing a service or resolving a dispute is known as a bribe taker. He has a chance to make quick cash with this.
Penalties for both those who offer and accept bribes
Bribery is a really corrupt behaviour. According to Indian law, both bribe givers and receivers are subject to punishment. A person who acts as a go-between between the bribe donor and the bribe recipient and facilitates bribery is also punished. Giving and accepting bribes are considered criminal offences under both the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 and the Indian Penal Code of 1960.
Previously, the law in India did not view a bribe giver as serious of an offender as a bribe receiver. The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2018 did, however, modify the legislation. Both providing and accepting bribes are now regarded as equivalent offences. The penalty for offering and accepting bribes has also been increased going forward. A person found guilty of bribery faces possible imprisonment and severe charges.
The minimum sentence for those who provide or accept bribes is now three years in prison. Additionally, they receive hefty fines for engaging in this wrongdoing. The sentence may be extended for up to seven years.
Repeat offenders of the practise of bribery risk a five-year prison sentence. This sentence may be extended for up to ten years.
Additionally, a statute protecting coercive bribery has been passed. In cases of coercive bribery, the victim is typically the one who offers the bribe. In such circumstances, the bribe donor is required to pay a sum of money in order to complete his work even when there is no justification for doing so. The victim must disclose the incident within 7 days in order for the statute to protect forced bribery to be effective.
The people in charge of a business organisation will be held accountable under this recently formed law if one of their employees bribes a person with their consent to advance the organization’s interests.
Essay On Who is Responsible for Bribe: Giver or Taker In English (500 Words)
Bribery is defined as the practise of demanding, offering, giving, or getting something of value in exchange for performing a specific type of service (mostly unlawful). Who is to blame—the bribe sender or the bribe taker—has frequently been in dispute.
It is challenging to generalise from the current legal framework, which holds that both bribe givers and receivers are equally at fault. Since both paying and receiving bribes contribute to this corrupt behaviour, it is accurate to state that both parties are at blame. However, in certain circumstances the giver is more at fault while in others the receiver is. Therefore, the issue of who is at responsibility varies from case to instance.
When the Bribe Taker Is More Responsible
In other instances, the potential bribe giver may have invested a lot of time, money, and effort in a project that was rejected. The government officials are still refusing to approve it, despite the approval procedure being straightforward. The project has the potential to be approved, but the lower-level, middle-level, and higher-level government employees are blocking that from happening. They won’t give the project their approval because it seems like a fantastic opportunity for them to make quick money.
The potential bribe donor previously invested a lot of time and money into developing his idea, so he lacks the resources and forbearance to pursue legal action against the government. He worries as well that he might lose the lawsuit because higher ranking government officials are in a stronger position than he is. He picks the less stressful option—paying bribes to the officials—in order to relieve himself of all the stress and complete his task. In situations like this, the bribe providers are not as responsible as the bribe receivers.
When the Bribe Giver Is More Responsible
There may be situations where a person who is unwilling to accept bribes is threatened to provide a service or give a clean bill of health in exchange for financial gain. The potential bribe receiver frequently decides to accept the bribe in exchange for the service since it appears to be a lucrative alternative, even if he might still refuse it and report the incident to the police.
Given that the services are frequently illegal, both the provider and the recipient share responsibility. But he frequently does this in order to avoid the risk of turning down the service. In this instance, we might conclude that the bribe donor is more at fault than the receiver because he put the recipient under duress by threatening him. The bribe taker cannot, however, be categorically labelled a victim.
Therefore, it is impossible to say with certainty who is more guilty of paying and accepting bribes. It might be either the donor or the taker of the bribe at any given time. But in many situations, both the providers and the recipients of bribes are equally to blame because they both regard it as a convenient solution.